06 - Planning and Zoning Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

`' Vote on reconsideration: All members voted "aye ". Motion carried. The Conditional Use Permit is back open: Mr. Steffens stated that it is not as important to build the lodge now as the amenities building. The Planning Commission suggested that no additional building permits in excess of 20 will be issued unless the amenities building is constructed and operational. The 21St unit will be the trigger; 40 units for the lodge construction. PUBLIC COMMENT: Paul Reichenbach, 27188 Sarah Lane, asked if the units were single family units or structures. Sue Moore, 90302 Seminol Bay, Pequot Lakes — Is there any consideration to those people already there? Who is financially responsible to keep up the amenities building? Mr. Marohn explained there are 60 owners after it is all done; now there are 9 owners plus 1 owner who owns 51. A motion was made by Tom Adams, seconded by Mark Hallan, to add an additional Condition to the Conditional Use Permit previously approved stating: 19. No additional building permits will be issued after 20 until the amenities buildings is constructed and operational and, in addition, no additional building permits will be issued after 40 units are built until the lodge is constructed and operational. Chairman Woog called for the vote: 6 ayes, 1 nay (John Derksen). Motion carried. A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by Mark Hallan, to approve the Preliminary Plat, based on the following Findings of Fact as stated in the July Staff Report: 1. The property is zoned waterfront commercial and open space. A realignment of the commercial waterfront zone will need to be done concurrent with a final plat application. 2. The plat creates 60 commercial shoreline dwelling units plus 46 lots dedicated for accessory structures, one Outlot A and one common remnant lot. 3. As a PUD, lot size dimensions are not factored in. Instead, overall density and density by tier is considered. This proposal meets the required density, which was considered under the PUD application. 4. No lots will require a variance for development based on the conditions of the PUD approval. 5. The land is suitable for development without significant alteration. Minutes 11 Pequot Lakes Planning Commission July 19, 2010