My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2018
>
04-03-2018 City Council Meeting
>
06.01 Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 12:51:28 PM
Creation date
3/29/2018 12:51:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
information from out of state. Some indicate 2 miniature horses equal one regular <br /> horse while others state 4 miniature horses equal one regular horse. A miniature horse <br /> could be 1/a, �/3, or 1/2 the size of a regular horse. <br /> Chair Hallan stated this should be added to the ordinance and defined. <br /> Planning Commission Member Birch asked if pygmy goats are smaller than a regular <br /> goat. Mr.Wilmes stated they are the size of a sheep. <br /> Discussion ensued and it was the consensus of the Planning Commission that a <br /> miniature horse is �/a of a large horse. .25 times i.4 Animal Units for a horse equals .35 <br /> Animal Units for a miniature horse. (.25 X�.4 = •35���Units) <br /> Staff was directed to send Mr.Wilmes a letter indicating a miniature horse is classified <br /> � •35�imal Units. <br /> Chair Hallan directed Staff to hold a Public Hearing to amend the Ordinance to include <br /> miniature horses. <br /> Planning Commission Member Norton inquired if goats should be included in the <br /> amendment also. Chair Hallan concurred. Considering the different sizes of goats, <br /> include a breakdown by weight, such as o — 50 lbs.,5i— ioo lbs., etc. <br /> Mr.Wilmes will return with his Conditional Use Permit application to have a horse. <br /> b. Open Meeting Law— Discussion <br /> Mr. Burslie explained chance or social gatherings,serial meetings and communication <br /> through correspondence and emails can be construed as violations of the Open Meeting <br /> Law. <br /> c. Sign Ordinance — Report by Mark Hallan <br /> Chair Hallan stated he met with Chamber members regarding signage. He had <br /> explained discussions took place last year regarding potential billboards. He stated, <br /> based on the discussion with the Chamber,the City will need to be looldng at some type <br /> of informational system,what can be done for our downtown business district and the <br /> school. <br /> Planning Commission Member Birch stated he is not opposed to a Community Sign,but <br /> not billboards. <br /> Planning Commission Member Leckband stated there has been a significant drop in <br /> traffic at the businesses. The Chamber and Community Foundation are working on a <br /> community information system. <br /> MINUTES 8 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> March i5, 2oi8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.