My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06.01 - Planning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2010
>
02-01-2010 Council Meeting
>
06.01 - Planning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2014 9:55:37 AM
Creation date
4/17/2014 9:53:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. The property is properly zoned Rural Residential, Open Space, Shoreline <br />�- Residential and Transition Residential. Tract A is currently used for residential <br />purposes while Tract B is vacant and does not have a use established. <br />2. Tract A would meet the minimum requirements for the Rural Residential district <br />when it is combined with the parcel abutting it to the north. Tract B would meet <br />the minimum requirements for the Transition Residential, Open Space, and <br />Shoreline Residential districts. <br />3. Both Tracts A and B have more than 20,000 square feet of buildable area. Neither <br />Tract A nor Tract B would be constrained from future development. <br />4. There are not any nonconforming structures located on Tract A or Tract B. <br />5. The survey does not indicate the impervious surface coverage for Tract A but it is <br />evident that it is less than 15 percent. Tract B does not contain any impervious <br />surface coverage. <br />6. The property is suitable in its natural state for the intended purpose and this lot <br />split would not be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents or of <br />the community. <br />7. It is assumed that Tract A contains a SSTS as it contains two existing buildings. <br />Tract B does not contain a SSTS and staff is attempting to verify whether soils <br />information is available from the local SWCD and whether that is sufficient to <br />verify the suitability of the site for two sewer sites, <br />8. The applicant is not proposing any provisions for water -based recreation. <br />9. Both tracts will conform to the minimum requirements of all four zoning districts <br />they encompass. <br />10. The proposed lots are unique in that they are currently split due to Highway 371 <br />and County Road'' 17. The existing lot lines are compatible with the layout of <br />existing properties in this area and will not constrain future development of <br />adjoining properties. <br />11. The existing lot lines are jagged and not at right angles to existing road lines but <br />follow the existing pattern of the right -of -way in this unique area. <br />12. Both Tract A and Tract B meet the minimum frontage on public right -of -way <br />requirement of 33 feet. <br />Subject to the following condition: <br />1. Upon approval, the portion of the property that is zoned Rural Residential (Tract <br />A) shall be submitted to Crow Wing County for a lot consolidation with Parcel <br />290101200CA0009. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />a. Comprehensive Plan Discussion — <br />There was no update on the sections previously discussed. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />A motion was made by Mark Hallan, seconded by John Derksen, to approve the <br />December Minutes, as corrected. All members voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />Minutes 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />January 21, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.