My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2017 Park Commission Meeting Packet
Laserfiche
>
Parks
>
Agenda Packets
>
2017
>
02-09-2017 Park Commission Meeting Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2017 11:57:04 AM
Creation date
12/21/2017 11:57:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Open Meeting Law Discussion <br /> � <br /> Background Information: Atta.ched please find several pages of information <br /> provided by the League of Minnesota. Cities regarding The Open Meeting Law. <br /> References throughout the document to "city councilmembers" includes park <br /> commission members. A few key points the Park Commission needs to be aware <br /> are: <br /> ✓ Chance or social gathering of city councilmembers will not be considered a <br /> meeting subject to the open meeting law, if a quorum is present, as long as <br /> the quorum does not discuss, decide, or receive information about official <br /> city business. <br /> ✓ Serial Meetings—Park Commission Members should not discuss specific <br /> agenda items outside of the regular meetings. <br /> ✓ Communication through letters, emails and telephone calls could violate the <br /> open meeting law. Information should be sent from Staff to Park <br /> Commission Members, not from Members to Members. Do not click <br /> "Reply All" to an email sent from Staff; you may use "Reply". Staff will <br /> � include a statement indicating same on information sent out. <br /> Staff will discuss with Park Commission Members; please review prior to the <br /> meeting. <br /> �I1. The open n�eeting la�nr �� <br /> � Ao Purpose <br /> M�nn.sc�c.� t3D.o1. 'I'he Minnesota.open meeting law generally requires that all meetings of <br /> public bodies must be open to the public. This presumption of openness <br /> serves three vital purposes: <br /> Rupp v.Mayasich,533 . It rohibits actions from bein taken at a secret meetin where it is <br /> N.W.2d 893(Minn.Ct App. p g g <br /> i99s�.st.cro�rv�s�e,s. impossible for the interested public to become fully informed concerning <br /> lnc.v.Drst 74Z Community decisions of ublic bodies or detect im ro er influences. <br /> Schools,332 N.W.2d l p P p <br /> (Minn. 1983). • It ensures the public's right to be informed. <br /> • It gives the public an opportunity to present its views to the public body. <br /> �._- <br /> League of Minnesota Cit�es Infortnation Memo: 11/9/2015 <br /> Meetings of City Councils Pa9e 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.