My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.02 2017 Capital Improvements/Utility Rate Analysis Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2017
>
09-05-2017 City Council Meeting
>
10.02 2017 Capital Improvements/Utility Rate Analysis Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2017 1:07:18 PM
Creation date
9/1/2017 1:04:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2032 <br />At this point, the plan calls for the major reconstruction of Patriot Avenue with an estimated cost of <br />$2,500,000. The City intends to use cash to pay for the project for fund 402 (the replenished funds <br />for the internal loans issued in 2018 described above). <br />The impact of taking on all of these projects as described will result in the following impacts: <br /> Tax rates will elevate: The City will need to increase its tax rate to cover the debt obligations. The <br />model projects the tax levy to jump to nearly 66% in 2020 before decreasing in the following years and <br />stabilizing back at 56% in the closing years of this plan. <br /> <br /> Water and Sewer rate increases are necessary: Sewer rate adjustments might not be necessary, but <br />advised nonetheless. It is always best to stay “ahead of the game” when it comes to Enterprise Funds. <br />Perhaps a 1% annual increase in Sewer rates would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Water rates are a bit more complicated due to the need to develop “conservation rates” in order to <br />comply with new rules regarding demand reduction measures. See our specific recommendations for <br />water rates later in this report. <br /> <br /> Debt levels remain low: Due to the fact that a significant portion of project costs will be funded by <br />internal loans (cash provided by County payments for road turn-backs), the City’s official debt ratios will <br />remain low (we are contemplating actual General Obligation Bonds for only a fraction of the identified <br />costs). We don’t anticipate any adverse effects on the City’s credit rating due to the proposed projects. <br /> <br /> Long term costs will increase slightly: Long term taxes and utility costs for a typical resident are <br />expected to rise only slightly, and at a lower pace than the historic rate of inflation. At stated earlier, the <br />City of Pequot Lakes is positioned very well strategically to take on new projects. <br /> <br />Water Rate Recommendations (See Tab 4 for specific rate recommendations) <br />All public water suppliers in Minnesota that serve more than 1,000 people must have a water supply plan <br />approved by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Water supply plans must be updated and <br />submitted to the DNR for approval every ten years. This requirement, in place since the 1990s, is designed <br />to encourage communities to deal proactively with providing sustainable drinking water for citizens, <br />businesses, and industry. <br /> <br />As part of the planning process, we focused on water rates that assist the City in meeting the DNR mandates <br />for demand reduction measures in a water supply plan. The DNR and communities are responsible for <br />implementing demand reduction/water conservation measures. Tiered rate structures meet the intent of the <br />demand reduction law. Specifically, we’ve developed a tiered rate system so that volumetric charges go up <br />as usage levels go up. There is a 50% bump from tier one to tier two, and a 25% bump from there to tier 3 <br />and then again to tier 4. <br /> <br />For residential, it is also important to note that we advise removing gallons allowed in the base rate. This is, <br />again, to comply with DNR’s required demand reduction measures. However, to offset the resulting <br />increase in monthly bills for most users we are recommending a 60% reduction in the base rate. The <br />combined impact of this results in a monthly water bill increase of about $3 for a typical household. <br /> <br />For commercial and multi-family, we recommend continuing the practice of providing up to 5,000 gallons with <br />the base rate. When we removed this allocation of gallons, fees became excessive for commercial and <br />multi-family, roughly 40-60% increase in 2018. We feel business routinely practice conservation, by being <br />driven by the bottom line so are inherently trying to conserve. <br /> <br />In order to assist in the funding of projects described earlier, we are also recommending a 3% annual <br />increase in water rates commencing in 2019. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.