My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2011
>
11-01-2011 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2014 9:34:53 AM
Creation date
3/24/2014 9:33:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
c. Field of Dreams, Discussion <br />`-- After reviewing the Minutes from the October 13, 2011 Park Board meeting, the <br />Planning Commission supports the Park Board's decision to continue planting trees in the <br />park areas creating a natural buffer between the road and the homes and to maintain the <br />intent of past Councils that the park areas be used as a buffer. Staff will forward this <br />message to the Park Board. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />a. Building Code Enforcement, Tom Nelson — Fire Chief (continuation) <br />Dan Warrington, the State Electrical Inspector for this area, is in favor of the City <br />adopting the Building Code. He stated a good example was the non- conforming structure <br />discussion earlier; structural integrity problems could be alleviated. He recommends the <br />City pass it and wishes more communities had the Building Code. <br />Mr. Nelson stated he included a letter in the packets. The examples of fees do not <br />include any land value. When asked by the Chair, Staff stated new home construction in <br />2010 and 2011 included 10 new homes and 7 dwelling additions, resulting in $5,598 in <br />Land Use Fees. <br />Mr. Marohn stated that his quote in Chief Nelson's letter was true, although he doesn't <br />want the Planning Commission to construe that he recommends adopting the Code. He <br />stated this would be the preferred alternative, but the City and the Planning Department <br />are dealing with more pressing issues and this would get in the way of that. He is not <br />advocating for the Building Code. <br />If we were to adopt the Building Code, future expansions could need to be brought up to <br />code. There are many variables and property owners would need to consult a licensed <br />design professional. <br />Chairman Pederson stated this is good information and is educating the Commission. <br />Mr. Nelson stated he thought this was a good idea for Pequot Lakes as he is a <br />Councilman in Breezy Point and the fees weren't a big difference. He is concerned with <br />the safety of the firefighters. This wouldn't solve all the problems, but it would be a step <br />in the right direction. He felt a recommendation from the Planning Commission was <br />more beneficial than just going to the City Council. <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the timing is not right; they would <br />like more information next month. They would like lists of communities in Crow Wing <br />and southern Cass Counties that do and do not have the Building Code. They would like <br />the information in a structured format, listing pros and cons. Also include information <br />based on values vs. square footage so costs can be compared. <br />b. Community Supported Agriculture (continuation) <br />`, This will be discussed next month. <br />MINUTES 4 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />October 20, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.