My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2011
>
09-06-2011 Council Meeting
>
07 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2014 9:57:35 AM
Creation date
3/20/2014 9:53:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. Tom and Toni Fleck Land Use Permit Discussion <br />Mr. Marohn explained that he has been working with the Fleck's for quite a while <br />deciding what to do with their existing cabin. They have a unique situation where the <br />cabin is approximately 15 feet from the lake. There are 3 options in the Ordinance and <br />they chose the 50% addition that would not go closer to the lake. <br />Mr. Marohn also explained that there has been a discrepancy between the architect and <br />Community Growth and City Staff as to the correct number for the 50% addition. A final <br />site visit discovered where the discrepancy came from. It is a grey area, but the architect <br />was counting the well house /pump house as habitable area. <br />The contractor was present, John Koupal from Start to Finish Builders and Remodelers. <br />He explained the Fleck's desire to keep the addition at 16 feet, rather than 15 feet, 4 <br />inches, which meets the 50% number City Staff determined. When asked, Mr. Koupal <br />stated that the foundation for the cabin does not include the well house. The screen porch <br />on the lake side has no foundation and is on piers; this area is now enclosed and not used <br />as a porch. <br />Mr. Marohn stated that the pump house is an ancillary structure; it cannot be accessed <br />from inside the dwelling. The implications are 9 square feet. <br />Mr. Koupal stated the cabin will be gutted from inside with new shingles and windows. <br />They need to take the floor boards up to place the water lines; it is now open space <br />underneath. It is a seasonal cabin now but they want to use it year - round. <br />Mr. Marohn stated there can be no structural changes to the existing cabin. If the well <br />house is being counted in the square footage, it has to stay the way it is, no changes. <br />They plan to demolish it <br />Mr. Marohn reminded the Planning Commission that it is their interpretation to count the <br />well house or not as part of the structure. The homeowners haven't ignored the <br />ordinance. Mr. Hallan stated that he does not have a problem with the addition being 16 <br />feet. This is a grey area and Staff cannot approve this. <br />It was the general consensus of the Planning Commission to allow the addition at 16 feet. <br />It was important that this was discussed with the Planning Commission. Staff will issue a <br />modification to their Land Use Permit. <br />Mr. Marohn reminded Mr. Koupal that removal of the trees by the water will require a <br />separate site visit. Staff will schedule several Planning Commission members to attend. <br />Removal of trees in the SIZ needs permission from the Planning Commission. <br />OLD BUSINESS: <br />Gloria Dei Church Update: <br />MINUTES 3 <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />August 18, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.