My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2011
>
07-05-2011 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning and Zoning Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2014 9:50:23 AM
Creation date
3/19/2014 9:49:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. Grow Zone Expansion: <br />It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to incorporate both the Grow Zone <br />Expansion and the Walkability Study into one discussion and to also include as part of <br />the Downtown Master Plan. <br />c. Walkability Study: <br />See Grow Zone Expansion. <br />d. Recap of Comprehensive Plan as Presented to City Council <br />Chairman Pederson informed the Planning Commission that the City Council had tabled <br />the Comprehensive Plan approval. When asked for his reason for not supporting Mr. <br />Ryan stated he had already given his concerns to the Planning Commission. Chairman <br />Pederson will revisit the recording of the May Planning Commission meeting and make <br />notes of what his objections were. Mr. Akerson stated he agreed with the introduction. <br />He also stated that the Comprehensive Plan as presented was not his vision for the town <br />and couldn't accept the Comprehensive Plan. The approval will rest until fall as Mr. <br />Ryan was too busy to work on it. Chairman Pederson stated that we will need to gather <br />information from them explaining exactly what is missing or what is in there that they <br />don't like. Chairman Pederson plans to ask Mr. Akerson for his vision points in writing. <br />Chairman Pederson asked Mr. Derksen to define his objections to the Comp Plan, either <br />in writing so we can look at it or indicate where the verbiage can be found. Mr. Derksen <br />stated the Economic Development part was developed on the Mom and Pop theory and <br />that has been debunked. The City needs to attract manufacturing. Chairman Pederson <br />stated he doesn't see where that is prohibited. Mr. Ryan pointed out Mann Lake but we <br />have businesses that have done that too. <br />Mr. Adams stated that Mr. Ryan was critical of the City not attracting businesses like <br />Mann Lake that started out in a garage and expanded. He is unfair and incorrect in not <br />acknowledging that we have Landis Gyr, Hunt Technologies, that started out in a garage, <br />and has 187 fulltime employees, professional jobs, well paying jobs. We also have the <br />School District which has 180 fulltime jobs that are largely professionally educated <br />people. <br />Mr. Derksen stated he is looking for companies that hire local people. He agrees with <br />what Mr. Habein stated last month that the school has not educated people in the area for <br />the jobs this area has. Mr. Habein stated that we cannot create $10 to $15 an hour jobs <br />for people that don't have skills. Mr. Derksen stated we need to try to attract some <br />companies. <br />Mr. Adams stated that TDS is a company in town. Those are a lot of jobs that are not <br />minimum pay. We have smaller employers such as medical services, excluding assisted <br />living, with 34 fulltime and 16 part-time jobs, and financial services with 77 fulltime and <br />10 part-time jobs, including CPA's and insurance. We do have entry level jobs, but we <br />do have good, well paying jobs in a town of 2,000. Mr. Ryan was totally wrong stating <br />we don't have opportunities. <br />MINUTES <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />June 16, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.