My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8 October 20, 2016 Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
11-17-2016 Planning Commission Meeting
>
8 October 20, 2016 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2016 1:06:48 PM
Creation date
11/9/2016 1:06:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
in reality we want it to be safe. How would an applicant prove the 6 items in Building <br /> Standards? <br /> Mr. Burslie stated it would be the owners' responsibility on how they are met. <br /> Planning Commission Member Norton stated that depending on the age, at one point <br /> they used aluminum wiring. If they don't open the walls,there could potentially be <br /> dangerous wiring. <br /> Planning Commission Member Wilson stated the contractor has stated he hardly ever <br /> opens up the walls. Some are so old no seal is left on the siding. <br /> Planning Commission Member Mortenson stated the Code from the 198O's is different <br /> from today for electrical and plumbing. They now need to be hard wired for arc faults, <br /> ground faults,smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors. It will be hard to find a <br /> contractor willing to take liability for certifying the wiring is okay. <br /> Planning Commission Member Brown asked if the owner can prove these 6 items in <br /> Building Standards, an older unit would be safe. How do they provide evidence? Is it <br /> doable? <br /> Mr. Burslie pointed out it may not make economic sense; it may be better to purchase a <br /> newer unit. <br /> Planning Commission Member Hallan stated per her email September 21 the Institute <br /> for Building Technology can re-issue or verify the original seal. Is that economically <br /> feasible? He wished the applicant was present. Her email indicates if the walls haven't <br /> been opened,then verification should provide evidence that the home meets safety <br /> standards,but are they certifying standards for 2016 or the requirements that were in <br /> place in 1998 when the home was manufactured. <br /> Mr. Burslie stated the last sentence of the second paragraph on page two states if the <br /> walls were not opened verification from IBTS should provide evidence that the home <br /> meets safety standards that were in place at the time it was manufactured. <br /> Planning Commission Member Norton reminded the Planning Commission of the <br /> number of items that would void a seal from his earlier research. <br /> Planning Commission Member Mortenson stated he would be comfortable with a cap of <br /> 10 to 20 years; Planning Commission Member Norton stated he would be comfortable <br /> with 10 to 15 year cap. <br /> MINUTES 2 <br /> Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br /> October 20,2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.