My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6 (b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
11-17-2016 Planning Commission Meeting
>
6 (b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2016 1:06:06 PM
Creation date
11/9/2016 1:06:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> a. Misconduct allegations <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 13D.05,subd. A public body must close a meeting for preliminary consideration of <br /> 2(b).Minn.Stat.§13.43, <br /> subd.2(4). allegations or charges against an individual subject to the public body's <br /> IPAD 03-020. authority. <br /> IPAD 14-004. The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br /> advised that a city could not close a meeting under this exception to consider <br /> allegations of misconduct against a job applicant who had been extended a <br /> conditional offer of employment. (The job applicant was not a city <br /> employee).The commissioner reasoned that the city council had no <br /> authority to discipline the job applicant or to direct his actions in any way; <br /> therefore,he was not"an individual subject to its authority." <br /> IPAD 10-001. The commissioner has also advised that a tape recording of a closed meeting <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 13.43. <br /> for preliminary consideration of misconduct allegations is private personnel <br /> data under Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd.4,and is accessible to the subject of <br /> the data but not to the public.The commissioner noted that at some point in <br /> time, some or all of the data on the tape may become public under Minn. <br /> Stat. § 13.43,subd.2. For example, if the employee is disciplined and there <br /> is a final disposition, certain personnel data becomes public. <br /> Minn.Stat.§13D.01,subs.3. The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br /> Minn.Stmt.§13D.05,subd.1. <br /> exception: <br /> • <br /> • Before closing the meeting,the council must state on the record the <br /> specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be <br /> discussed. <br /> • The meeting must be open at the request of the individual who is the <br /> Note:There is a special subject of the meeting.Thus,the individual should be given advance <br /> provision dealing with g' g <br /> allegations of law notice of the existence and nature of the charges against him or her, so <br /> enforcement personnel that the individual can make a decision. <br /> misconduct;see Minn.Slat.§ <br /> 13D.05,subd.2(a)and • The meeting must be electronically recorded, and the recording must be <br /> section preserved for at least three'years after the meeting. <br /> • If the public body decides that discipline of any nature may be warranted <br /> regarding the specific charges, further meetings must be open. <br /> b. Certain not-public data <br /> The general rule is that meetings cannot be closed to discuss data that are not <br /> public under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.A meeting must <br /> be closed,however, if the following not-public data is discussed: <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 13D.05,subs. • Data that would identify alleged victims or reporters of criminal sexual <br /> 2(a). <br /> conduct,domestic abuse, or maltreatment of minors or vulnerable adults., <br /> • Internal affairs data relating to allegations of law enforcement personnel <br /> misconduct or active law enforcement investigative data. <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: r 11/9/2015 <br /> Meetings of City Councils Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.