Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> • Before closing the meeting,the council must state on the record the <br /> specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the <br /> subject to be discussed. <br /> • The meeting must be electronically recorded,and the recording must be <br /> preserved for at least three years after the meeting. <br /> [PAD 14-007 and IPAD 15- • At the next open meeting,the public body must summarize its <br /> 002(discussing what type of g <br /> g <br /> summary is sufficient). conclusions regarding the evaluation.The council should be careful not <br /> to release private or confidential data in its summary. <br /> c. Attorney-client privilege <br /> Minn.Stat.§13D.05,subd. Meetings between the governing body and its attorney to discuss active, <br /> 3(b). <br /> Brainerd Daily Dispatch threatened, or pending litigation may be closed when the balancing of the <br /> LLC v.Dehen,693 N.W.2d purposes served by the attorney-client privilege against those served by the <br /> 435(Minn.Ct.App.2005). open meeting law dictates the need for absolute confidentiality.The need for <br /> Prior Lake American v. absolute confidentiality should relate to litigation strategy, usually <br /> Mader,642 N.W.2d 729 tY g gy,and will usuall <br /> (Minn.2002). arise only after a substantive decision on the underlying matter has been <br /> made. <br /> Northwest Publications,Inc. This privilege may not be abused to suppress public observations of the <br /> v.City of St.Paul,435 <br /> N.W.2d 64(Minn.Ct.App. decision-making process,and does not include situations where the council <br /> 1989).Minneapolis Star& will be receiving general legal opinions and advice on the strengths and <br /> Tribune v.Housing and <br /> Redevelopment Authority in weaknesses of a proposed action that may give rise to future litigation. <br /> and for the City of <br /> Minneapolis,251 N.W.2d <br /> 620(Minn.1976). <br /> Minn.Stat.§13D.01,subd.3. The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br /> exception: <br /> See The Free Press v.County • Before closing the meeting,the council must state on the record the <br /> of Blue Earth,677 N.W.2d <br /> 471(Minn.Ct.App.2004) specific grounds permitting the meeting to be closed and describe the <br /> (holding that a general subject to be discussed. <br /> statement that a meeting was <br /> being closed under the • The council should also describe how a balancing of the purposes of the <br /> attorney-client privilege to attorney-client privilege against the purposes of the o pen meetin g <br /> laW discuss"pending litigation" <br /> did not satisfy the demonstrates the need for absolute confidentiality. <br /> requirement of describing the The council must actually communicate with its attorney at the meeting. <br /> subject to be discussed). • 3' y g <br /> d. Purchase or sale of property <br /> A public body may close a meeting to: <br /> I <br /> St S <br /> Mimi. tat.§ 3D.05,subd. <br /> M S v. § 3 Rice • Determine the asking price for real or personal property to be sold by the <br /> Watershed Dist.,No.A09- public body. <br /> 1841(Minn.Ct.App.2010) • Review confidential or nonpublic appraisal data. <br /> (unpublished opinion). P c a PP <br /> • Develop or consider offers or counteroffers for the purchase or sale of <br /> real or personal property. <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/9/2015 <br /> Meetings of City Councils Page 13 <br />