My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6 (b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
11-17-2016 Planning Commission Meeting
>
6 (b) Open Meeting Law - Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2016 1:06:06 PM
Creation date
11/9/2016 1:06:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> If councilmembers don't have a city email account,there are some things to <br /> think about before using a personal email account for city business. First, <br /> preferably only the councilmember should have access to the personal email <br /> account. Using a shared account with other family members could lead to <br /> information being inadvertently deleted.Also, since city emails are <br /> government data, city officials may have to separate personal emails from <br /> city emails when responding to a public-records request. <br /> Second, if the account a city councilmember wants to use for city business is <br /> tied to a private employer,that private employer may have a policy that <br /> restricts this kind of use. Even if a private employer allows this type of use, <br /> it is important to be aware that in the event of a public-records request under <br /> the MGDPA, or a discovery request in litigation,the private employer may <br /> be compelled to have a search done of a councilmembers' email <br /> communication on the private employer's equipment or to restore files from <br /> a backup or archive. <br /> See Handbook for Minnesota What may work best is to use a free,third-party email service, such as gmail <br /> Cities,Chapter 27 for more <br /> information about records or Hotmail, for your city account and to avoid using that email account for <br /> management any personal email or for anything that may constitute an official record of <br /> city business since such records must be retained in accordance with the <br /> state records-retention requirements. <br /> H. Advisory opinions <br /> 1. Department of Administration <br /> Minn.Stat.§13.072,subs. The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br /> 1(b).See IPAD for an index <br /> of advisory opinions by topic. authority to issue non-binding advisory opinions on certain issues related to <br /> the open meeting law.A court or other tribunal must give deference to an <br /> advisory opinion. A$200 fee is required.The Information Policy Analysis <br /> Division(IPAD)of the Department of Administration handles these <br /> requests. <br /> See Requesting an Open A public body subject to the open meeting law can request an advisory <br /> Meeting Law Advisory <br /> Opinion from IPAD. opinion from the commissioner. In addition, a person who disagrees with the <br /> manner in which members of a governing body perform their duties under <br /> the open meeting law can also request an advisory opinion. <br /> 2. Minnesota Attorney General <br /> Minn.Stat.§8.07. See index The Minnesota Attorney General is authorized to issue written advisory <br /> of Attorney General Advisory <br /> opinions from 1993 to opinions to city attorneys on"questions of public importance."The Attorney <br /> present. General has issued several advisory opinions on the open meeting law. <br /> Star Tribune Co.v.Univ.of Opinions of the Attorney General are not binding on the courts but are <br /> Minnesota Bd.of Regents, <br /> 683 N.W.2d 274,289(Minn. entitled to careful consideration when they are of long standing. <br /> 2004). <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 11/9/2015 <br /> Meetings of City Councils Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.