My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2013 Park Commission Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Parks
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
11-14-2013 Park Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2016 9:21:42 AM
Creation date
10/13/2016 9:21:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Board Minutes <br /> November 14, 2013 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Loven indicated that the cost would be $1,900 of which $1,600 could come from <br /> the park budget and $300 could come from the roads and streets budget. <br /> COMMISSIONER NAGEL MOVED TO ACCEPT THE SIBLEY LAKE PARK <br /> MAPPING PROPOSAL FROM WSN FOR $1,900 TO BE PAID FROM THE <br /> PARK AND ROADS & STREETS BUDGETS. COMMISSIONER GIBBONS <br /> SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> 6. Dog Park <br /> Per the City Council's direction, the Commission discussed other locations for the <br /> dog park which included areas by the City's water plant, water tower, and Mayo <br /> Lake Nature Preserve. Mike Loven had a concern with the water plant location <br /> because it will be affected by the future Highway 371 realignment. <br /> Commissioner Nagel stated that the Mayo Lake Nature Preserve location would <br /> be nice for water dogs. Council Member Gardner preferred that the dog park <br /> remain in town. Commissioner Gibbons liked the water tower location. Mayor <br /> Adams noted that she just returned from New York and the proposed dog park at <br /> Sibley Lake Park is big in comparison to New York's dog park. The consensus of <br /> the Park Commission was to visit the other sites before a proposal is re- <br /> submitted to the City Council. <br /> 7. Mayo Lake Nature Preserve <br /> Mike Loven informed the Commission that a request was received from a private <br /> individual who would like to cut wood in the Mayo Lake Nature Preserve. Mr. <br /> Loven stated that he is not in favor of allowing this due to regulation, safety, and <br /> training concerns. He also noted that weekend regulating would be difficult and <br /> this is not allowed in any other City parks. The consensus of the Commission <br /> was to deny this request. <br /> Mayor Adams discussed the possibility of logging in parts of the park with DNR <br /> oversight. She noted that this could bring in additional revenue for the City. <br /> Mayor Adams stated that the Park Commission members should review the <br /> Forest Management Plan for the Mayo Lake Nature Preserve which is located on <br /> the City's website. <br /> 8. Other Business <br /> The playground system, lighting, vandalism, and attracting people to Sibley Lake <br /> Park were discussed. Commissioner Ettesvold stated that the Commission <br /> needs to go back to the original idea of creating the dog park at Sibley Lake Park <br /> to attract people to this park. It was noted that the City Council did not like the <br /> size of the dog park proposed. Council Member Gardner stated that it is better to <br /> start small with the dog park to see how much it is used versus starting too big. <br /> Chair Malecha stated that she likes the dog park at Sibley Lake Park because it <br /> would get people to use this park. Mike Loven stated that putting the fence on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.