My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-19-2015 EDC Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
05-19-2015 EDC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 11:18:49 AM
Creation date
10/12/2016 11:18:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For the category"Other," respondents most commonly specified a form of communication for their <br /> lake association, such as such as "Lake Association Newsletter" or"Lake Association Meeting," which <br /> accounts for 33 of 86 open-ended responses. Two other common responses include"City and other <br /> Newsletter" and"Church," accounting for 11 and 7 responses respectively. <br /> These findings _ <br /> underscore the Lake&Civic Associations <br /> important role of Shoppers, Flyers& Magazines - <br /> lake associations and <br /> the connection they Friends, Neighbors&Relations RIME <br /> make with second City&Other Newsletters <br /> homeowners. Other Local Businesses _ <br /> response categories Other Mail <br /> are smaller, but were <br /> also included.They Church <br /> encompassed Billboards&Roadside II <br /> shoppers, flyers, Other Internet II <br /> magazines, friends, Library <br /> neighbors, city and <br /> other newsletters, Other <br /> local businesses, and 0 10 20 30 40 <br /> churches. Figure 20:"Other"form of communication specified by number of respondents <br /> Views on Local Development&Future issues <br /> Extension asked second homeowners about development in general and their ideas for community <br /> improvement in particular. Respondents are split in their support for additional development. Half <br /> believe additional residential development threatens the quality of life in their second-home <br /> community,while just more than half want additional retail and commercial development in their <br /> second-home community. <br /> I would like to see more Additional residential <br /> retail and commercial development threatens <br /> development the quality of life <br /> 32%, )9% <br /> 51%, 50% <br /> 17%, 1111 it` 20% <br /> •Disagree •Don't Know •Agree •Disagree *Don't Know •Agree <br /> Figure 21:Response to commercial Figure 22:Response to residential question <br /> development question by number of by number of respondents(n=551) <br /> respondents(n=554) <br /> V IIIII Second Homeowners of Central and West Central MN 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.