My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-2004 Planning Commission Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2004
>
06-17-2004 Planning Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 9:27:20 AM
Creation date
10/12/2016 9:26:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lruttttllnrici 0..PiNu & rr>ert Mt !tai;!,the appileant endow be prepared at the putir <br /> hearing to explain the unique hardship for the proposed varianaa. A hardship is defined a s a:contrition•whereby <br /> the property in question can not be put to a reasonabfe use If used under Gitlin allowed di the dff <br /> controls,tn'e pilghl of thio landowner is der to cwr+urnata cos unique to his prOpeitY not created by the landowner. <br /> and The venoms,if granted,Will net alter the elsential chara r of t11e c lity. gaOhOMIC COn3Ickitaticris aloha <br /> shall not constitute a hardahip fl.re► it le tee of'r the' 'property-exits fader the terms of the Ordnance. <br /> • <br /> (1)What ate the unique circumstance of the parcel sire.;shape,topography or other characteristic that <br /> Mahe attiat tntereratatlon of the Ordinance imoractic el? <br /> The parcel it turned in the wrong direction;SO thl*t it we use the side and rear setbacks we will have to back out of <br /> the Orinige unto Wei Hwy 371. We would prefer to have the rear setback it>feet and the side sct <br /> allowing to back Qut on the less traveled streets <br /> We propose to spilt the lot so loth lots would be 13,500 square feet eel <br /> (2)-Hoar Is g hinting thla vmtance consistent wfh thelnntent of the City of Petit*(ski land use or <br /> Subdivision Ordinance? <br /> Cilje of P6giitt!Jake*his been invet tigsttng this ordinance which would make this variance unnecossa ry. <br /> (3)HOW will ieseansbls use of the parcel be deprived if the variance Is not granted? <br /> The • r=l will net be used for our low to moderate income tam' = =r. ,s. <br /> (4)Whet other options,either a ertreln9 ar non-eeretortnity,have been Considered and whyr were those <br /> one net oftwatri? <br /> To r tit a drwow which would • .ok out to 37 would be bar- ' into.tratfo and issues, <br /> id)Dee ' ' theht On th' Ube and enlaynsent of other property in the immediete vidhity. If there Ie <br /> no <br /> 071Pact,Oxylein tyhv, <br /> Main Impact would be two new houses that it now used for stiStaace of r.art and tither items would make the <br /> lot fit into whet other lots have. <br /> Rev:Janu'2002 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.