My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-2004 Planning Commission Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2004
>
09-16-2004 Planning Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
10/11/2016 2:41:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Lot 3, Block 1 is only marginally buildable as a commercial lot. Roughly a <br /> third of the lot is unbuildable due to steep topography. Significant alteration <br /> of the remaining topography will be needed for construction on this lot. <br /> Drainage from this property is to Lot 2, Block 1. There is severe potential for <br /> erosion on to the public right-of-way from development on the west side of <br /> the property. Proposed sewage treatment systems are placed at the top of a <br /> 10% grade, which raises health concerns from effluent seepage. This lot does <br /> not meet the standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 5. Lot 1, Block 2 is only marginally buildable as a commercial lot. The sewage <br /> treatment systems are proposed to be located on a 16% slope. Steep slopes <br /> with severe erosion potential cover nearly half of the lot. There is not enough <br /> area to provide 50% coverage without significant alteration of the topography. <br /> This lot does not meet the standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 6. Lot 2, Block 2 is not a buildable commercial lot. The proposed building site <br /> is not accessible without significant topographic alteration. Stormwater from <br /> both adjacent lots and the proposed right-of-way drain to the building site. <br /> Although only approximately a fourth of the lot has slopes exceeding those <br /> allowed, the lot does not have any areas where commercial construction could <br /> be done without significant alteration to the topography. This lot does not <br /> meet the standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 7. Lot 3, Block 2 is not buildable as a commercial lot. The lot is not accessible <br /> without significant alteration to areas with excessive slopes. There is severe <br /> erosion potential in these areas. The proposed sewage systems are in a severe <br /> slope area, an area which is a drainageway for stormwater from the proposed <br /> `-- right-of-way and the northeast side of the lot. The proposed building is on an <br /> 8% slope. There would be no way to achieve 50% coverage on this lot <br /> without significant alteration to the topography. This lot does not meet the <br /> standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 8. Lot 4, Block 2 is marginally buildable as a commercial lot. Development on <br /> this lot will not be possible without significant alteration of the topography. <br /> Drainage from this lot goes on to Lot 5, Block 2. This lot does not meet the <br /> standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 9. Lot 5, Block 2 is not buildable as a commercial lot. Approximately 60% of <br /> the lot has slopes that are severe. There is extreme erosion potential in these <br /> areas. There is also the potential of erosion from the public right-of-way. <br /> This lot does not meet the standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> 10. Lot 6, Block 2 is not buildable as a commercial lot. Approximately 50% of <br /> the lot has slopes that are severe. Development on this lot will require <br /> significant alteration of the topography. The sewage systems are proposed to <br /> be located in an area with slopes exceeding 20 percent, which raises concerns <br /> over erosion, long-term viability of the system and the health impacts of <br /> effluent leaching. Drainage from this lot is to Lot 5, Block 2. The lot is not <br /> accessible without significant topographic alteration. This lot does not meet <br /> the standards of Section 140, Subpart D. <br /> September 2004 Staff Report Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.