My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-2002 Planning Commission Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
2002
>
10-17-2002 Planning Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 12:25:33 PM
Creation date
10/10/2016 12:25:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pursuant to the Pequot Lakes City Ordinance, Section 170.040, the applicant should be prepared <br /> _ at the public hearing to explain the unique hardship for the proposed variance. A hardship is <br /> defined as a condition whereby the property in question can not be put to a reasonable use if used <br /> under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to <br /> circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, <br /> will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not <br /> constitute a hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Ordinance. <br /> (1) What are the unique circumstances of the parcel size, shape, topography or other <br /> characteristics that make strict interpretations / y <br /> of the Ordinance iimpractical? <br /> (2) How is granting this variance consistent with the in tent of the City of Pequot Lakes Land Use <br /> or Subdivision Ordinance? <br /> /...--S' <br /> C-- c,v-''+S c- In! tt,-=tom c /.—r?Al=1�1 Xo a <br /> Pc, b 1:-c._ 7-.- 1-71f <br /> (3) How will reasonable use of the parcel be deprived if the variance is not granted? <br /> f -4— .(27 v o,-N1 <br /> (4) What other options, either conforming or non-conforming, have been considered and why <br /> were those options not chosen? <br /> ;4445--- Prfn-r-1 y I Th 6 Y; '1.4 0 14 -7-31< C-=P(r:i 0 F -Pi+c C7�its. -- <br /> (5) Describe the impact on the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity. If <br /> there is no impact, explain why. <br /> All <br /> rREV: JANU 2002 <br /> _ ., .. , _, __ _ __. _ ______ _._ <br /> _________._ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.