Laserfiche WebLink
A pplicsble Statutes: Section 60.030 of the ordinance allow s for accessory uses as a <br /> oonditionaluse in the Comm ercialdistrict. <br /> To approve a condition b rP penn it,the follow ing ilan sm ustbe considered by the <br /> Planning C cram ission: <br /> 1. Them aintenanee of the public health,safety and w elfarP. <br /> 2. The location of the site with r)ectto existing and proposed aaee_m roads. <br /> 3. Its am pabloility w ith adjaoentland 11FP.s. <br /> 4. Its can patibilily w ith the intentof the zoning districtin w hick such tiFv,is <br /> imposed. <br /> 5. Its can patibility with the oboes of this 0 ndmance and its consistency <br /> w ith the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Further,the 0 rrlinance directs thatthe Comm ission evaluate the effects of the proposed <br /> use on: <br /> 1. The prevention and eontrolofw aterpo]lution,including sedim entation <br /> and nutrient]oading. <br /> 2. Existing topography and drainage feats and vegetative coveron the <br /> site. <br /> 3. The erosion potentialof the site based upon the degree and direction of <br /> slope,soiltype and existing vegetative cover. <br /> 4. The need forthe proposed»s.,fora shoreland location. <br /> 5. The am ountof liquid waste to be generated and the adequacy of the <br /> proposed sew age treatm entsyslun <br /> 6. The viability of structures and other facilities as view ed from public <br /> w aters <br /> 7. A dequacy of the site forw at ersupply and on-site sew age treatm ent <br /> system s. <br /> 8. The t y p e s,uses and numbers ofw a t P r r-r a ft t h a t t h e pmt tw i]lgenerate in <br /> relation to the suitability of public waters to safes accon m odate these <br /> w ater raft. <br /> Staff Findings: W e have review ed the application and propose the follow ing findings of <br /> factfbryou to consider: <br /> 1. Although the properly ow neris certainly hoping form ore business,there <br /> is no indication thatthe proposed 115P w illgenerate significantly m ore <br /> traffic on existing access roads. <br /> 2. The proposed 1 r e is consistentw ith the cart prehens ve plan and the <br /> objectives ofCanm erc ialnms in the 0 rdinance. <br /> 3. The area to be paved was already covered w ith m pervious surface,so no <br /> additionalrunoff should be added. <br /> 4. The 1 F,P.is notw thin the shoreland zone. <br /> Planning C an m ission D irection: The C an m ission can moan m end to the C ouncilthat <br /> they approve the C ondidionalU se Penn it. A nacamm endation of denialeouli also be <br /> made. If C an m i: ion m an bens faelthey need m ore reform ation tom ake a decision,the <br /> m lasing infrmn ation should be indicated and the application should be tabled. <br /> c fl Y OFPHUOT IAKES Page 2 <br /> AH ,2003 SCAFF REPORT <br /> tom, <br />