Laserfiche WebLink
6. Any addition or alteration to the outside dimension of a nonconforming <br /> structure,that cannot meet these provisions must be authorized by a variance <br /> pursuant to Article V of this Ordinance;and <br /> 7. All other provisions of this Ordinance are complied with. <br /> The Ordinance specifically states that,in order to recommend approval of the variance, <br /> you must find that all of the following can be answered affirmatively: <br /> 1. Has the applicant demonstrated a hardship? (Hardship means the <br /> property cannot be put to a reasonable use under conditions allowed by <br /> the Zoning Ordinance. Economic considerations alone do not constitute a <br /> hardship.) <br /> 2. Are there exceptional circumstances unique to this property,which were <br /> not created by the landowner? <br /> 3. Can the variance be granted without upsetting the purpose and intent of <br /> the Zoning Ordinance? <br /> 4. Can the variance be granted without altering the essential character of the <br /> surrounding area? <br /> You would be allowed to attach relevant conditions to the variance approval to mitigate <br /> any negative impacts that a variance from the Code would have. <br /> Staff Findings:We have reviewed the application and propose the following findings of <br /> fact for you to consider: <br /> 1. The property is an existing non-conforming use since it sits 12 feet into the 75 <br /> foot shoreline setback, The proposed structure will be moved back to 6 feet <br /> into the shoreline setback. Therefore,the proposed plan decreases the existing <br /> non-conformity. <br /> 2. The plan preserves the minimal amount of parking area that currently exists. <br /> 3. Since it is a non-conforming lot,the Zoning Ordinance states that additions or <br /> alternations shall not exceed 50%of the square footage of the existing <br /> structure,and if that cannot be met,must be authorized by a variance. <br /> 4. The applicants wish to protect a space of mature trees to the west of the <br /> existing structure with the proposed plan. <br /> 5. The proposed plan maintains or exceeds all other setback and impervious <br /> coverage requirements. <br /> 6. No development is proposed near the existing and compliant drainfield. <br /> 7. The majority of new development will occur from north to south parallel to <br /> the adjacent property lines. The proposed plan will only add 12 feet to the <br /> structure to the profile as viewed from the lake and will remain as one story so <br /> as to minimize the virtual impact. <br /> 8. The proposed structure will be similar to the existing structure and be <br /> consistent with the essential character of the surrounding area. <br /> 9. The applicant's proposal comes closer to meeting the intent of the Ordinance, <br /> which is to increase the lake setback,decrease non-conformities,and protect <br /> lake water quality,than the current situation or the other options available <br /> under the Code. <br /> CITY OF PEQUOT LAKES PAGE 3 <br /> JUNE 2003 STAFF REPORT <br />