Laserfiche WebLink
his or her own system. To deny someone a permit because a neighboring system is failing <br /> and causing degradation of the lake quality is unfair. <br /> Recreation <br /> 1. P.64, Policies#1 &#2:The first two policies are on the surface inconsistent with each other. <br /> How do you preserve the integrity of City lakes by limiting the level of water activities on the <br /> lakes and shorelines at the same time as you make lakes,wetlands, and public forests more <br /> accessible to the public. Either clarify this or remove one of the policy proposals. <br /> 2. P.65, MT action#9, resort owner incentives:this sounds good, but needs more specifics in <br /> order to test viability. <br /> Infrastructure <br /> 1. P.80, Policy#3, sentence#1: In order to remove the negative tone, rewrite this section as <br /> follows: "Individual sewage treatment systems provide adequate levels of treatment to <br /> protect the environment,especially on shoreline properties,only when they are properly <br /> installed, used,and maintained." <br /> 2. General: As this section contains the primary essential services provided by the City, more <br /> thought and detail should go into this section. As it is, it is of limited value if assessing the <br /> next move for the City in this area. <br /> 3. General: What were Mike Loven's and Brett Twardy's comments regarding this section? <br />