My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-2013 EDC Minutes
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2013
>
04-16-2013 EDC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2016 3:41:43 PM
Creation date
9/30/2016 3:41:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <br /> APRIL 16,2013 <br /> MEETING MINUTES <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark Jurchen, Cindy Roggenkamp, Barb Merritt, Cindy <br /> Rieck, and Tommy Woog <br /> ALSO PRESENT: Sandy Peine, City Clerk; Sheila Haverkamp, BLAEDC; <br /> Dawn Bittner, Zoning Administrator; and Mayor Adams <br /> 1. Call Meeting to Order <br /> The meeting was called to order by Chair Jurchen at 8:01 a.m. <br /> 2. Approval of 3-19-2013 EDC Minutes <br /> COMMISSIONER ROGGENKAMP MOVED TO APPROVE THE <br /> 3/19/2013 EDC MINUTES. COMMISSIONER MERRITT SECONDED <br /> THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 3. Urban and Rural Taxing Districts <br /> The EDC reviewed the Springsted proposal for the urban and rural district tax rate <br /> analysis. The EDC wanted to note that they would like to see the affect on the <br /> residential properties if the tax rates were the same in the urban and rural districts. <br /> The EDC stated that they would also like to see how the equalization of taxes <br /> would affect the commercial city tax rate. The EDC is interested in trying to <br /> lower the commercial tax rates. <br /> It was the consensus of the EDC to have Springsted complete an analysis of a <br /> phase-in of the current rural tax rate to that of the urban tax rate and to outline the <br /> impact to various tax payers based on the following objectives: <br /> 1. That an analysis be done on as many property classifications as possible, <br /> but especially on the following: <br /> A. Residential <br /> B. Lakeshore <br /> C. Non-lakeshore <br /> D. Homestead <br /> E. Non-homestead <br /> F. Commercial <br /> 2. That the phase-in period for the urban tax rate to the rural tax rate is 6 <br /> years which is the same phase-in period used for the commercial property <br /> in the original annexation agreement. <br /> 3. That the tax rate is based on the 2013 levy with the knowledge that the tax <br /> rate will be affected by either an increase or decrease in the levy in future <br /> years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.