My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-15-2011 EDC Meeting
Laserfiche
>
Economic Development (Permanent)
>
EDC Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
02-15-2011 EDC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2016 2:00:50 PM
Creation date
9/30/2016 2:00:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Once there are potential projects, incentives and financing can <br /> impact investments. <br /> • Really good ideas came out of the brainstorming session. We <br /> should narrow our focus to a specific location, such as a small <br /> business subsidy in the downtown area, filling in the infrastructure. <br /> It is underutilized. If that model works, we could expand it to <br /> other parts of the city. <br /> • Retail and service in the downtown are not going to succeed <br /> without the industrial capacity first. Hesitant to not include the <br /> Business Park area. <br /> • When asked how BLADC decides where to route business <br /> contacts, Sheila Haverkamp stated that with most companies the <br /> sites and locations are parts of the component to make a decision; <br /> most already know where they want to be located and what the <br /> amenities are. <br /> • There are resources and if there are people out there looking,they <br /> will find BLADC. <br /> • No other communities are doing the type of subsidy we are talking <br /> about. We will need to market it, such as in newspaper articles in <br /> Pequot Lakes, Brainerd and the Twin Cities. <br /> • Rather than tying tools to a business we would like to see in town, <br /> let the private market decide. If a potential business is not on our <br /> list,they are going to ask for the subsidy any way. Also, do not tie <br /> to job creation. Tie it to making the downtown walkable and <br /> livable; apartments above businesses help the businesses do better <br /> if people live in that area. <br /> • We need to list which tools are possible, such as WAC/SAC fees, <br /> permit fees, water fees, etc. Some fees could be financed or be tied <br /> to the duration the business stays in town. Some fees could be <br /> financed and forgiven. <br /> • Fees could be escrowed and a portion returned annually. <br /> • How do we establish a Revolving Loan Fund? Part of the annual <br /> budget could be set aside each year, an Economic Development <br /> Authority could be established or private sector people could make <br /> donations. <br /> It was the consensus of the EDC as follows: <br /> • Forgive or finance fees and return. Fee structure can be worked <br /> with,tied to length of time they stay in business, not necessarily <br /> with jobs tied to it, and return a portion. <br /> • If a variance or hearing is required,no fee reduction. Over the <br /> counter permits can have fees reduced. If a business can avoid the <br /> hearing process, fees can be forgiven. <br /> • Continue discussion developing Revolving Loan Fund. <br /> Minutes 2 <br /> Economic Development Committee <br /> February 15, 2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.