Laserfiche WebLink
boundaries represented in Mr. Greer's sketch plan. The property boundaries in the Staff Report <br /> are the properties that are recorded with the County, as this information comes directly from <br /> Crow Wing County. <br /> At last month's meeting, the Planning Commission suggested reviewing three different options <br /> for rezoning this property and what it would require for additional rezonings with each option. <br /> Option A: The first option is to rezone all the properties as the City had proposed—to Transition <br /> Residential. Findings of fact supporting this rezoning option are provided in this report. <br /> Rezoning in this option would not require additional adjoining properties to be rezoned to <br /> accommodate this request. <br /> Option B: The southeastern parcel, <br /> (29011320oCoo889) Parcel "C", Parcel Option B ` <br /> "AAC", and Parcel "D" rezoned to Urban AGRICULTURE <br /> Residential, with the remaining north <br /> parcel rezoned to Transition Residential. <br /> TRANSITION <br /> This option does not necessarily require RESIDENTIAL ' <br /> additional rezonings as the Ordinance A �I;I O r <br /> indicates that the Forest Management <br /> zone may also be compatible with other " u R <br /> zones other than Transition Residential, R E S I D E NT I AL <br /> Commercial, Agriculture, Rural <br /> Residential, and Light Industrial zones in <br /> areas where forest stands exist. Because <br /> the purpose and intent of the Forest ' 1' '' R A N S i T i G N R E S I D E N T I A L t <br /> Management District is to preserve rural `o ,.,``E a If <br /> character and provide for sustainable ` <br /> forest management, the Transition <br /> Residential zone would be a better zoning <br /> classification for the property to the east �Opti*R ICU L T U R E R R A G R I C U L T„R,,E <br /> in this option. <br /> Option C: All parcels rezoned to Urban i <br /> Residential. This option requires that the <br /> three properties to the north be rezoned :R R N s I T I o N RESIDENTIAL <br /> from Agriculture to Transition Residential <br /> in order to provide the appropriate buffer <br /> between Urban Residential uses in the IRAN 51 T 1 O N <br /> south and Agriculture and Rural R E S I D E N T I A L 'TRANSITION <br /> -__ RESIDENTiAi <br /> Residential uses to the north. Like Option i <br /> B, this option may also require that the r R E S I D E N T I A , <br /> property to the east be rezoned to <br /> Transition Residential, as the purpose and 4 " <br /> intent of this zone is to serve as a medium- T R A N S I Tc <br /> density buffer between areas of higher �► -- <br /> density and areas of lower density. <br /> An important item to note, however,is that, should the City choose to pursue either Option B or <br /> Option C,the property that is nestled into Mr. Greer's properties on the western side would then <br /> be surrounded by Urban Residential zones. This property, owned by Mr. Cogan, also on this <br /> agenda,was proposed to be rezoned to Transition Residential,but Mr.Cogan would like to see if <br /> Rural Residential would be an option for his property. Rezoning Mr. Greer's properties to Urban <br /> City of Pequot Lakes Staff Report 3-4 <br /> October 20,2005 <br />