06 - Planning Commission Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

units, but what is being proposed is a 2o percent reduction. He is not requesting a more intensive use, but guests want the lodge closer to the beach area. Chair Seils opened Public Comment: Wayne Mueller, DNR Aquatic Plant Specialist, stated he would clarify information included in correspondence. There are three types of plants below the OHW: submerged, floating leaf and emergent or bulrush. Any emergent removed does require a permit. The DNR is most protective of bulrush as they are most important to a lake. Bulrush are important for fish habitat and greatly decrease erosion from wave action. Once destroyed it is difficult to get reestablished; they require low water levels to establish. (Applicant's Summary) refers to Minnesota Administrative Rule 6280.0350 which describes submergent, not emergent, vegetation. The Summary further states "will obtain permit from DNR". This should state "will apply for permit from DNR". Mr. Mueller further stated that the beach is not the DNR jurisdiction, but swimming is also a concern. There is an adequate beach. The DNR like to keep affected area localized and to keep the footprint small. The second beach is not warranted at this time. If there is a 20% reduction in clientele, there would be less need for an additional beach. He stated he cannot see 20o people being on the beach at one time. A beach is an intensive use and would affect aquatic vegetation. Mr. Mueller also stated there was reference made to a verbal agreement between the developer and the DNR. This is a complicated situation and need to have a permit issued. There can be no verbal agreement. Tim Brastrup wrote in the original 2005 evaluation, along with Ron Morreim, of the importance of bulrush. The DNR does not recommend or dictate where a dock goes. Ann Beaver, President of the Cullen Lakes Association, 26834 Pine Acres Road, Nisswa — Stated she appreciates number of lots being reduced. The proposed lodge is 245•5 feet long on the main and upper level and parallel with the shoreline which will produce a major visual affect from the lake and across the lake; it will have an impact on anyone going through the lake, even though the lodge is in Tier 2 it is on higher ground than the villas and beach on Tier One. Mrs. Beaver further stated that along the shoreline where villas have been constructed a lot of vegetation and trees have been removed. Jeff Miller and Tom Steffens have stated in the past that the villas need to have views of the lake. Construction of the lodge will likely involve trimming of branches to have lake views. From the lake, as well as any shore that views the resort, it is going to look like a solid wall of buildings. This will have an impact on use and enjoyment. Minutes Pequot Lakes Planning Commission January i6, 2oi4 6