My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 - Planning Commission Report
Laserfiche
>
City Council (Permanent)
>
Agenda Packets (Permanent)
>
2014
>
02-03-2014 Council Meeting
>
06 - Planning Commission Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2014 10:23:19 AM
Creation date
2/28/2014 10:01:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commission Member Brown stated that grading is limited to 5o cubic yards, making the <br />second beach moot because increasing the existing beach would be more than 5o cubic <br />yards. The existing beach may be over the 5o cubic yard mark; the Staff Report asks for <br />a measurement of grading on the beach. <br />Regarding the path, Commission Member Brown further stated that in her personal <br />opinion the fetch across the lake is a beautiful, natural area; removing bulrushes would <br />degrade the area. Four hundred guests at a time and that much golf cart traffic in that <br />area would not be good either. We need to see grading information before we make that <br />determination. <br />Mr. Burslie stated the City has 12o days to make a decision. Staff can create Findings of <br />Fact and Conditions if this is tabled. <br />A motion was made by Commission Member Oraskovich to table this matter to the <br />February meeting to obtain more information. Commission Member Hallan seconded <br />the motion. <br />Mr. Steffens stated the 5o cubic yards is subjective; he just wants to clean out, brush and <br />not move any material. Mr. Burslie stated if you till or disturb existing ground counts <br />toward the 5o cubic yards. <br />Commission Member Hallan would like applicant to indicate what is existing, size when <br />e�ended and proposed new; where it is at, how much work it is going to take, and where <br />the docking is located. Explain how the ordinance is applied to all of it. Mr. Burslie <br />reiterated the property is allowed 5o cubic yards of grading in the Shore Impact Zone. <br />Mr. Steffens stated that some ordinance or part of a CUP, or because this was the only <br />resort in the City, a statement was made that all rules don't need to apply; it's not <br />restricted. Limiting to 5o cubic yards is not a correct application for this. <br />Mr. Burslie stated that the DNR rules trump City rules. The DNR writes rules 1,00o feet <br />from the lake, the Shoreland Rules. <br />Wayne Mueller stated he copied the DNR Aquatic Rule and will give to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />All members voted "aye". Motion carried. <br />Chair Seils closed the Public Hearing. <br />Minutes <br />Pequot Lakes Planning Commission <br />January 16, 2oi4 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.